Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 124 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8150 - 171 vs 167 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - CA$87.12 vs CA$110.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3820 - CA$0.52 vs CA$0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
81%
Price, CA$
CA$110
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13917 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
167
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13917 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |