Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 2061 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - CA$110.0 vs CA$126.88
- Up to 9% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-8100 - CA$0.43 vs CA$0.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Core i7-3820 - 272 vs 257 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
257
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$110
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13351 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
272
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
91%
Price, CA$
CA$126.88
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$126.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13352 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |