Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G3900 - 218 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - CA$42.99 vs CA$134.65
- Up to 68% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-10105 - CA$0.2 vs CA$0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
218
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
32%
Price, CA$
CA$134.65
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$134.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |