Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100 is 2685 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - CA$112.0 vs CA$126.88
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 20% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-875K - 538 vs 450 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-875K - CA$0.24 vs CA$0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18340 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
538
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$126.88
88%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$126.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18341 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |