Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4560.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Up to 56% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$49.99 vs CA$112.98
- Up to 54% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G6900 - CA$0.24 vs CA$0.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Pentium G4560 - 219 vs 212 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
212
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
219
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
46%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4560 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |