Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1840 - 135 vs 116 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 64% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$41.21 vs CA$112.98
- Up to 57% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G6900 - CA$0.36 vs CA$0.84 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
42%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
116
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |