Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4188 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in Metro Exodus than Core i5-760 - 146 vs 139 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 64% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$41.21 vs CA$112.98
- Up to 61% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Celeron G6900 - CA$0.3 vs CA$0.77 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
146
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.77/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
139
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |