Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 8% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1620 - 726 vs 671 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 71% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$32.99 vs CA$113.5
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 261 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
25.514660012476607%
Multi-Core
723
26.817507418397625%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |