Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1620 - 192 vs 167 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 67% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$36.89 vs CA$112.98
- Up to 63% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G6900 - CA$0.22 vs CA$0.59 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
37%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
167
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |