Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4237 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-875K - 192 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 11% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-875K - CA$0.59 vs CA$0.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 1% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$112.0 vs CA$112.98
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |