Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 614 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-10400F - 135 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - CA$112.98 vs CA$140.6
- Up to 21% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-10400F - CA$0.84 vs CA$1.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Buy for CA$140.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |