Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 620 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Ryzen 3 3100 - 204 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - CA$113.5 vs CA$126.7
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74078 minutes ago
Buy for CA$126.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74079 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |