Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2740 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 135% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-8320 - 54 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$180.0 vs CA$307.17
- Up to 75% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-8320 - CA$3.33 vs CA$13.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
54
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$180
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18143 minutes ago
Buy for CA$307.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |