Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 17% better in Ready or Not than FX-8150 - 272 vs 233 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 18% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$93.19 vs CA$113.5
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77834 minutes ago
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77834 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |