Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-870 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-870 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4501 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-870.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 26% better in Dota 2 than Core i7-870 - 212 vs 168 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-870 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Up to 26% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$84.08 vs CA$113.5
- Up to 7% better value when playing Dota 2 than Celeron G6900 - CA$0.5 vs CA$0.54 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
212
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
92.59259259259258%
Price, CA$
CA$113.5
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48106 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
168
79.24528301886792%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-870 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |