Buy on Amazon
CA$87.12
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2750 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - CA$87.12 vs CA$138.88
- Up to 30% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-9100F - CA$0.52 vs CA$0.74 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8150 - 187 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
167
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15427 minutes ago
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
187
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
70%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
62%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W, BX80684I39100F
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15428 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
