Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1420 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 2% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - CA$87.12 vs CA$88.88
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 3% better in New World than FX-8150 - 101 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing New World than FX-8150 - CA$0.88 vs CA$0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18373 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
101
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$88.88
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18373 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |