Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - CA$87.12 vs CA$104.99
- Up to 16% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i7-3770 - CA$0.41 vs CA$0.49 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 2% better in Fortnite than FX-8150 - 216 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
212
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15102 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
216
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
83%
Price, CA$
CA$104.99
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |