Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-6100 - 251 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - CA$82.49 vs CA$104.99
- Up to 21% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-3770 - CA$0.33 vs CA$0.42 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
251
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
78%
Price, CA$
CA$104.99
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16610 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
250
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$82.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$82.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16610 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |