Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1420 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 5% better in HITMAN 2 than FX-8150 - 116 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than FX-8150 - CA$66.34 vs CA$87.12
- Up to 27% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than FX-8150 - CA$0.57 vs CA$0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17043 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
116
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17043 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |