Buy on Amazon
CA$145
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1330 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Borderlands 3 than Pentium G4400 - 217 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - CA$36.99 vs CA$145.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i3-9100F - CA$0.18 vs CA$0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
217
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.67/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$145
25%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W, BX80684I39100F
Buy for CA$145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
201
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80662G4400 Pentium Processor G4400, 3.3 GHz
Buy for CA$36.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 374 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
