Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 385 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 20% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G4900 - 554 vs 463 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - CA$49.99 vs CA$138.88
- Up to 56% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-9100F - CA$0.11 vs CA$0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
554
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15833 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
463
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15832 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |