Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 1478 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - CA$49.99 vs CA$169.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 5 5600 - CA$0.19 vs CA$0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Celeron G4900 - 284 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
257
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
284
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
31%
Price, CA$
CA$169
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |