Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 2165 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - CA$49.99 vs CA$180.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-3770 - CA$0.54 vs CA$1.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 54 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G4900 - 94 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
93
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
94
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.91/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$180
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |