Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 460 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - CA$49.99 vs CA$179.08
- Up to 71% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Ryzen 5 3400G - CA$0.17 vs CA$0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 2% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G4900 - 306 vs 299 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
299
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14109 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
306
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$179.08
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$179.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |