Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - CA$49.99 vs CA$222.88
- Up to 76% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-10600KF - CA$0.23 vs CA$0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Fortnite than Celeron G4900 - 230 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
215
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17136 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$222.88
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$222.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |