Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 1372 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - CA$108.0 vs CA$249.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-12500 - CA$0.69 vs CA$1.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-12500 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 17% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G4900 - 182 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
156
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4148 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.37/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$249
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |