Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 455 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - CA$49.99 vs CA$279.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-7700 - CA$0.4 vs CA$1.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 13% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G4900 - 141 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15151 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
141
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.98/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$279
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |