Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - CA$49.99 vs CA$289.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 7600X - CA$0.54 vs CA$2.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 54 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 44% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G4900 - 134 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
93
69%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13937 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.16/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$289
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$289 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13938 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |