Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - CA$108.0 vs CA$378.88
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Stray than Celeron G4900 - 188 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Buy for CA$378.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
28.374021188392444%
Multi-Core
1051
11.460037073383491%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |