Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - CA$378.88 vs CA$434.33
- Up to 9% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-12900KF - CA$2.05 vs CA$2.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-11900F - 192 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
185
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$378.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$378.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10977 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.26/FPS
90%
Price, CA$
CA$434.33
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$434.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |