Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$49.99 vs CA$388.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.29 vs CA$1.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 24% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G4900 - 215 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
173
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13563 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.8/FPS
16%
Price, CA$
CA$388
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13564 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |