Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 672 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$108.0 vs CA$389.99
- Up to 70% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i7-6900K - CA$1.35 vs CA$4.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Remnant II than Celeron G4900 - 86 vs 80 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
80
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4155 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
86
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.53/FPS
29%
Price, CA$
CA$389.99
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$389.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |