Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$49.99 vs CA$400.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-11900K - CA$0.28 vs CA$1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 36% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G4900 - 244 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
179
73%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
244
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$400
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |