Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 1737 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - CA$49.99 vs CA$312.4
- Up to 82% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i5-13400 - CA$0.1 vs CA$0.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G4900 - 565 vs 509 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
509
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13917 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
565
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
18%
Price, CA$
CA$312.4
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$312.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13917 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |