Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100 is 2106 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i3-14100 - CA$108.0 vs CA$220.54
- Up to 40% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-14100 - CA$0.34 vs CA$0.57 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 20% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G4900 - 388 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
322
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4156 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
388
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.57/FPS
59%
Price, CA$
CA$220.54
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$220.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |