Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 151 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - CA$49.99 vs CA$160.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-9100 - CA$0.42 vs CA$1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G4900 - 131 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
120
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13368 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.22/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$160
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$160 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13369 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |