Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - CA$49.99 vs CA$174.99
- Up to 64% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-10400 - CA$0.81 vs CA$2.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 24% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Celeron G4900 - 77 vs 62 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
62
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13451 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
77
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.27/FPS
35%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13451 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |