Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 1952 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 9% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 232 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$255.59 vs CA$303.46
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$255.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74532 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
213
91.8103448275862%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
84%
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74534 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
51.07127240926979%
Multi-Core
5794
55.905055962948666%
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |