Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 357 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$108.0 vs CA$250.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Control than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$0.54 vs CA$1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Celeron G4900 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4151 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.24/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$250
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |