Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 357 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$44.99 vs CA$250.0
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G4900 - 174 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75207 minutes ago
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
57.67790262172284%
Multi-Core
1051
22.95762341633901%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |