Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 142 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$200.16 vs CA$250.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$1.34 vs CA$1.68 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
149
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |