Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1132 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - CA$179.08 vs CA$188.88
- Up to 4% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-6800K - CA$1.06 vs CA$1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 3400G - 171 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 12 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
169
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$179.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$179.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14626 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.1/FPS
96%
Price, CA$
CA$188.88
94%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14626 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |