Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1330 days newer than Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 7% better in War Thunder than Core i3-6100 - 178 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-6100 - CA$0.78 vs CA$0.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13485 minutes ago
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13485 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |