Buy on Amazon
CA$88.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 945 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G4900 - 216 vs 215 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 44% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - CA$49.99 vs CA$88.88
- Up to 44% better value when playing Death Stranding than Pentium G4400 - CA$0.23 vs CA$0.41 per FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
216
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
56%
Price, CA$
CA$88.88
56%
FPS Winner
Intel BX80662G4400 Pentium Processor G4400, 3.3 GHz
Buy for CA$88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8548 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
215
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8548 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
