Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive FX-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2365 days newer than the more expensive FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 4% better in Lost Ark than FX-6100 - 229 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than FX-6100 - CA$49.99 vs CA$82.49
- Up to 41% better value when playing Lost Ark than FX-6100 - CA$0.22 vs CA$0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
229
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14009 minutes ago
Buy for CA$82.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14009 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |