Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2038 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 23 than Core i3-3220 - 160 vs 153 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - CA$49.99 vs CA$69.88
- Up to 33% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i3-3220 - CA$0.31 vs CA$0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
160
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15714 minutes ago
Buy for CA$69.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15714 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |