Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2332 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 30% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1620 - 180 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - CA$32.99 vs CA$79.99
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75179 minutes ago
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
29.767103347889375%
Multi-Core
723
19.70564186426819%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |