Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4330 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4330 is 272 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-4330 - CA$32.99 vs CA$63.33
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Celeron G1620 - 170 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75500 minutes ago
Buy for CA$63.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75501 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
38.367729831144466%
Multi-Core
723
33.72201492537313%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-4330 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |