Buy on Amazon
CA$32.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1002 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - CA$32.99 vs CA$59.99
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1620 - 119 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 51 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75780 minutes ago
Intel BX80662I36100 6th Generation Core i3-6100 Processor
Buy for CA$59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75781 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
34.25460636515913%
Multi-Core
723
30.950342465753423%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
