Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8300 - 341 vs 318 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than FX-8300 - CA$59.99 vs CA$66.77
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73799 minutes ago
Buy for CA$66.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73798 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |