Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms the more expensive FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 377 days newer than the more expensive FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6100 - 167 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than FX-6100 - CA$66.77 vs CA$80.8
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$66.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74011 minutes ago
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74011 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |